You’ve carefully negotiated your lease, perhaps did it years ago. Your landlord seems to be treating you well and things seem to be going fine as you grow and manage your business. However, there’s a potential threat looming for your business that you may not be aware of.
The last economic boom was fueled by “easy” credit, and the current recession has set the stage for a “perfect storm” where a major cross section of commercial real estate properties (office, retail, warehouse, hospitality, etc.) are overleveraged and in imminent danger of foreclosure by mortgage lenders.
Commercial space vacancies are up in most markets what with “right-sizing” by companies (reduction in space by office users) and bankruptcies of major retailers. As a consequence, many commercial properties have had 35% and greater deterioration in their values (as against former highs when financing occurred during 2006-2008 cycles; commercial properties values are largely determined by their expected cash flow).
These diminished market values will not support the required refinancing of commercial mortgage notes set to mature in the next three years. Quite a lot of properties are currently financed by five year notes. Adding to the overall pain is the anticipated increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans, and foreclosures resulting from the failure of income cash flows to cover ongoing debt service.
Landlords across the spectrum, from individual owners to major REITS, will simply not be able to find the equity necessary to be able to refinance their mortgages in light of diminished market values and lenders’ more stringent loan-to-value (LTV) requirements. Many commercial properties will thus revert to ownership by foreclosing mortgage lenders. Those lenders (as new, unwilling owners of the properties) will seek all alternatives at their disposal to maximize recoveries when liquidating those assets.
Among other actions a foreclosing lender may take to enhance property value will be termination (where the tenant does not have a non-disturbance right from that lender) of 1) tenant leases having rental rates below current market, and 2) selected leases of tenants viewed as not sufficiently creditworthy. Many relatively smaller tenant leases will be at risk for such termination.
For protection against this coming reality tenants need to focus, now more than ever, on making sure that they have current subordination and non-disturbance agreements (“SNDAs”) in place that appropriately protect the tenant’s continued occupancy. A SNDA is a wholly separate document from the lease, which is signed by both the landlord’s mortgage lender and the tenant. Frequently, but not always, they are also signed by the landlord.
Many tenants are not aware of the importance of SNDAs, and often sign them without thought or review when form SNDAs are received from landlords with instructions that they be signed ASAP - per the terms of the typical lease, SNDAs are to be signed within ten to fifteen days after receipt by the tenant. This is a significant mistake since SNDAs should not be viewed as a “routine” or “housekeeping” matter. Rather, proposed SNDAs should be carefully reviewed by the tenant and its legal counsel before signing, no matter what comforting statements are made by the property’s management. Potentially just as bad, many smaller tenants never seek nor receive SNDAs with their landlord’s lender.
As a starting point, tenants are cautioned to get language in their lease requiring the landlord to exercise reasonably diligent efforts to cause the mortgage lender(s), both current and future, to provide the tenant benefit of “non-disturbance rights” (explained further, below).
SNDAs come into the picture when the landlord takes out financing on its property, and the building is third party occupied (has tenants). Where there is no financing on a building (100% equity) SNDAs are generally not needed – there is an exception, though, in the case of ground leases. The landlord’s lender will usually make sure that most or all the tenants in the financed building sign the lender’s form of SNDA.
The lender’s objective is to have the tenant(s) agree that the lease is “subordinate” to the lender’s security interest in the property – this gives the lender’s interest “priority” over the lease. This is typically a critical pre-condition to the funding of the financing (or refinancing) on the building. The lender will also insist on SNDA language requiring the tenant to “attorn” to that lender if there is a foreclosure on the property – meaning that the tenant is obligated to pay rent directly to the lender after receipt of a foreclosure notice respecting the building’s mortgage.
When new financing on a building is in process, the tenant will usually, by virtue of its having received a form of SNDA for its signature, be put on notice that a refinance or additional mortgage lender is acquiring a security lien (deed of trust) on the building in which that tenant occupies space.
When a new tenant signs a lease for a building already covered by an existing mortgage deed of trust, that later lease is automatically (as a matter of law) subordinate to the mortgage without need for an SNDA. In those situations it is critical that a tenant negotiating a new lease get a requirement in its lease for the landlord to use diligent efforts to have its lender provide and sign a SNDA protecting the tenant’s continued occupancy. That SNDA needs to be given concurrently with, or immediately after, the signing of the new lease. The lease language also needs to provide that a SNDA will be forthcoming if there is a future refinancing or further financing on the building.
Additionally, periodic inquiry by the tenant (especially smaller tenants) of its property management is a good idea toward making sure that the tenant has an updated SNDA with respect to any new lenders on the building of which the tenant may otherwise not be aware of.
Many favorable changes to a form SNDA can often be had just by asking. When reviewing the proposed form of SNDA, tenant’s legal counsel will make sure the SNDA contains lender recognition of the tenant’s continuing occupancy rights, and provides for lender’s commitment not to terminate that lease (and tenant’s occupancy rights) just because the foreclosing lender’s security interest is “superior” to the tenant’s lease. These protective provisions provide the critical “non-disturbance” rights. Without a non-disturbance commitment a foreclosing lender could elect to terminate the tenant’s lease, and force that tenant to: 1) enter into a new lease on less favorable economic terms just to stay in the space, or 2) immediately have to relocate to other space. Needless to say, proper non-disturbance rights in a SNDA are essential to avoid such an unwelcome crisis for the tenant.
Depending on the leverage of a particular tenant, there are a host of other protective measures that a tenant may seek to have in place via a SNDA, including a restriction on the lender’s right to preemptively receive insurance proceeds from casualty insurance policies. The objective here is to preserve the landlord’s obligation to rebuild and restore the leased space (and building) after a casualty event, and to make sure that the landlord has the insurance proceeds to do so. This concern is more typical for tenants that are single or majority users of a facility, for retail space users that have accumulated goodwill in their location, and in the case of ground leases.
However, the primary focus all tenants need to have addressed in a SNDA are, again, the protection of continuing occupancy rights, and the commitment that the succeeding landlord (foreclosing lender, or purchaser in lieu of foreclosure) will honor the terms of the tenant’s lease on a post foreclosure basis.
Lars Andersen is an independent practice attorney with over 23 years experience in commercial leasing and a wide variety of business entity transactions. He may be reached at 703-349-1251, and via email at [email protected]. Please note that the above article is informational only, and should not be construed as legal advice with respect to your situation or matter – if such advice is required the services of an attorney should be engaged.